RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Arc Pro A30M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (2000MHz vs 1695MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+281%
15620
Arc Pro A30M
4096
Blender
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+631%
2764
Arc Pro A30M
378
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
1024
144
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
50W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
