RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 280M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 280M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+4076%
15620
GeForce GTX 280M
374
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-IV
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
16
4608
Shading Units
128
144
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.360 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.44 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
374.5 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
