Home Comparison RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1695MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +516%
15620
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2534

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
DG1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
188 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net