Home Comparison RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs P106M

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs P106M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1695MHz vs 1291MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
P106M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 115W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation +425%
15620
P106M
2974

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

36
SM Count
9
4608
Shading Units
1152
144
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
75W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net