RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
+3967%
15620
Radeon E4690 MXM
384
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
36
SM Count
-
4608
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
144
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
30W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1