RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
7464 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 210W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+7293%
39630
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
536
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2070 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
448bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
60
SM Count
27
7680
Shading Units
216
240
TMUs
72
80
ROPs
28
240
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
206.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
619.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
39.63 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
39.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
619.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
210W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
