RTX 6000 Ada vs FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
17376 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+9006%
91060
FireStream 9250
1000
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
800
568
TMUs
40
192
ROPs
16
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
RV770
AD102
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
