RTX A5500 vs Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
10048 additional rendering cores
Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A5500
+7280%
34100
Quadro CX
462
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1080 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
80
SM Count
24
10240
Shading Units
192
320
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
320
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
Theoretical Performance
159.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
532.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
34.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
34.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
532.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
230W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
