RTX A6000 vs Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
10304 additional rendering cores
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A6000
+3665%
38710
Tesla C2075
1028
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
84
SM Count
14
10752
Shading Units
448
336
TMUs
56
112
ROPs
48
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
201.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
604.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
38.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
38.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
604.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
247W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
