Tesla C2075 vs Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 500W)
Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
7744 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Arctic Sound M
+1334%
14750
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
128
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
