Tesla C2075 vs Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+143%
1028
Quadro 2000M
422
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
4
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF106
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
