Tesla C2075 vs Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
+111%
1028
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
486
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
8
448
Shading Units
256
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF100
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
