Tesla C2075 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
+415%
5299
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
30
448
Shading Units
1920
56
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
TU106
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
