Tesla C2075 vs Tesla S2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (247W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1028
Tesla S2050
1028
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
783 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
448
56
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
247W
TDP
900W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GF100
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
