Xeon 6325P vs EPYC Embedded 8124P
We compared two server CPUs: Xeon 6325P with 4 cores 3.5GHz and EPYC Embedded 8124P with 16 cores 2.45GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Xeon 6325P 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.45GHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 125W)
EPYC Embedded 8124P 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4800)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 12MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Score
General Parameters
Feb 2025
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Raptor Lake-R
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 1700
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
-
Transistor Count
17.75 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
55 W
Power Consumption
125 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
163 mm²
Die Size
2x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.45 GHz
5.2 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
4
Total Core Count
16
8
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
35.0
Multiplier
24.5
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
6
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
16
PCIe Lanes
96
