Home Comparison Xeon 6756E vs EPYC Embedded 8324P

Xeon 6756E vs EPYC Embedded 8324P

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon 6756E with 128 cores 1.8GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon 6756E 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 96MB)
Lower TDP (180W vs 225W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2024
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sierra Forest
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 4710
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon 6(Sierra Forest-SP)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))

Package

-
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
225 W
Power Consumption
180 W
96°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x73 mm²
10 nm
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

1.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
2.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
128
Total Core Count
32
128
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
18.0
Multiplier
26.5
96 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
4 MB per module
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
96 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
2
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
1 TB
Max Memory Size
-
8
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
5
88
PCIe Lanes
96

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy