Home Comparison Xeon Platinum 8260M vs AMD EPYC 9384X

Xeon Platinum 8260M vs AMD EPYC 9384X

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon Platinum 8260M with 24 cores 2.4GHz and AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon Platinum 8260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (768MB vs 35.75MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon Platinum 8260M
1406
AMD EPYC 9384X +54%
2169
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon Platinum 8260M
13703
AMD EPYC 9384X +26%
17274
VS

General Parameters

Dec 2018
Release Date
Jun 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Cascade Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Platinum(Cascade Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

8 billions
Transistor Count
90.16 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
165 W
Power Consumption
320 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
24
Total Core Count
32
48
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
25.5
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
35.75 MB shared
L3 Cache
768 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
8
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy