Home Comparison Xeon W 11955M vs AMD EPYC 9175F

Xeon W 11955M vs AMD EPYC 9175F

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon W 11955M with 8 cores 2.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9175F with 16 cores 4.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon W 11955M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9175F 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (4.2GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (512MB vs 24MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 10nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

May 2021
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Tiger Lake-H
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel BGA 1787
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
UHD Graphics 750
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Tiger Lake-H)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))

Package

-
Transistor Count
133.04 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
320 W
72 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
190 mm²
Die Size
16x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
16
-
Performance Core Threads
32
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
8
Total Core Count
16
16
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
42.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1.25 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
24 MB shared
L3 Cache
512 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
2
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
4
PCIe Version
5
20
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy