Home Comparison Xeon w9 3595X vs Centaur CHA

Xeon w9 3595X vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: Xeon w9 3595X with 60 cores 2GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Xeon w9 3595X 's Advantages
Released 123 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (112.5MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 385W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon w9 3595X +104%
1611
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon w9 3595X +329%
17118
Centaur CHA
3982
VS

General Parameters

Aug 2024
Release Date
Jan 1901
Intel
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Sapphire Rapids
Core Architecture
CHA
Intel Socket 4677
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Sapphire Rapids)
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
385 W
Power Consumption
70 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
4x477 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²

CPU Performance

2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
60
Total Core Count
8
120
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20.0
Multiplier
12.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
112.5 MB
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2
2
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
4 TB
Max Memory Size
-
8
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
112
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy