Xeon X5355 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3251
We compared two server CPUs: Xeon X5355 with 4 cores 2.667GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3251 with 8 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Xeon X5355 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.667GHz vs 2.5GHz)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3251 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 65nm)
Lower TDP (55W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon X5355
301
AMD EPYC Embedded 3251
+189%
870
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon X5355
1355
AMD EPYC Embedded 3251
+264%
4939
General Parameters
Nov 2006
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Clovertown
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 771
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Clovertown)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
0.582 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
65 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
120 W
Power Consumption
55 W
63 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
2x143 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
2.667 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
4
Total Thread Count
16
333 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
8.0
Multiplier
25.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
4 MB per die
L2 Cache
512 K per core
-
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR2, DDR3
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
2
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
0
PCIe Version
3
-
PCIe Lanes
32
