Xeon X5355 vs EPYC Embedded 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Xeon X5355 with 4 cores 2.667GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Xeon X5355 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.667GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (120W vs 180W)
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 65nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Xeon X5355
301
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+452%
1664
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Xeon X5355
1355
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+885%
13349
General Parameters
Nov 2006
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Clovertown
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 771
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon (Clovertown)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
0.582 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
65 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
120 W
Power Consumption
180 W
63 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
TSMC
2x143 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
2.667 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
4
Total Core Count
32
4
Total Thread Count
64
333 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
8.0
Multiplier
26.5
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
4 MB per die
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR2, DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
0
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96
