NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA GRID K200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe
+1264%
31.24 TFLOPS
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
9216
Shading Units
1536
288
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GK104
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
