Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe +111%
31.24 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
9216
Shading Units
8192
288
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
DG2-512
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net