Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA A10 PCIe vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
8640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10 PCIe +4048%
31.24 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
-
9216
Shading Units
576
288
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

162.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
488.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
31.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
976.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK104
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy