Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +3910%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jun 2011
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
1792MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
5120bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
8
6912
Shading Units
256
432
TMUs
32
160
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
80 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
142W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy