Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +28989%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Sep 2008
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
5120bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
4
6912
Shading Units
32
432
TMUs
16
160
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
42W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy