Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
6896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe 80 GB +55585%
19.49 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1512 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

80GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
5120bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.94TB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
2
6912
Shading Units
16
432
TMUs
8
160
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
34W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G96
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy