Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
9184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +39300%
31.52 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
9216
Shading Units
32
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
G84
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy