NVIDIA A10M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 600.2GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A10M
+69%
23.44 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2022
Release Date
Jan 2021
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
7680
224
TMUs
240
80
ROPs
120
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
