Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +980%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Jan 2013
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
128
80
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
122W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy