Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA A10M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM A10M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1635MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10M +3097%
23.44 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tesla Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

975 MHz
Base Clock
-
1635 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
7168
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
80
ROPs
16
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

130.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
366.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
23.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
732.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy