Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA A16 PCIe vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2007
Tesla
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

885 MHz
Base Clock
-
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
231.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.24 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
67.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
4.339 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.339 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
135.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
R500
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.107 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy