NVIDIA A2 vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM A2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
A2
+124%
4.531 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2010
Quadro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
200.1GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1440
40
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
40
Tensor Cores
-
10
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
70.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
4.531 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.531 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
70.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.154 billion
Unknown
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
