Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs NVIDIA NVS 300

NVIDIA A30 PCIe vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A30 PCIe +26361%
10.32 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2011
Tesla Ampere
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
3072bit
Memory Bus
64bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy