Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
10736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A40 PCIe +83055%
37.42 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Nov 2009
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
695.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
84
SM Count
2
10752
Shading Units
16
336
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

194.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
584.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
37.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
37.42 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
584.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy