Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA A40 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
10536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A40 PCIe +6881%
37.42 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1812 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
695.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
84
SM Count
27
10752
Shading Units
216
336
TMUs
72
112
ROPs
28
336
Tensor Cores
-
84
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

194.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
584.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
37.42 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
37.42 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
584.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
171W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy