Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
14208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +16625%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
228
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
384
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

760W
TDP
51W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy