AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2100MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+3594%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
14592
Shading Units
1024
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
760W
TDP
40W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
146 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
