Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 172% (2100MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +3350%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
2304
880
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

760W
TDP
150W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net