Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (2100MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
14208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +14106%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
228
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
384
880
TMUs
24
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

760W
TDP
45W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy