AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 140M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
14576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+471438%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 140M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
14592
Shading Units
16
880
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
760W
TDP
10W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-740-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
