Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
14352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +19610%
122.6 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Apr 2009
Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
14592
Shading Units
240
880
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

760W
TDP
188W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy