Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
14584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +532943%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
14592
Shading Units
8
880
TMUs
4
0
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

760W
TDP
12W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
146 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy