AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2100MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 760W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A
+4046%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2020
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
228
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
14592
Shading Units
896
880
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
760W
TDP
50W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
MI300
GPU Name
TU117B
-
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
146 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
