Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
11904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +3015%
122.6 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Nov 2012
Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

228
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14592
Shading Units
2688
880
TMUs
224
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

760W
TDP
235W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy