Home GPU Comparison AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

AMD Instinct MI300A vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2100MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
13952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 760W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Instinct MI300A +8625%
122.6 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Dec 2015
Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
5200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5300GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
228
Compute Units
-
14592
Shading Units
640
880
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
980.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
122.6 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
61.3 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

MI300
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
146 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

760W
TDP
55W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy