Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 540 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD Radeon 540 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM AMD Radeon 540 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 540 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AMD Radeon 540
0.908 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250 +10%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
Polaris
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
28.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
908.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
908.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
56.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV770
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy