Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (2350MHz vs 2200MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+22%
4.813 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
3.942 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Dec 2023
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Dependent
Bandwidth
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
24
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Xe-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
