Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel Arc Graphics 32EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 32EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (2350MHz vs 1950MHz)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+382%
4.813 TFLOPS
Arc Graphics 32EU
0.998 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Oct 2024
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.60 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.997 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
998.4 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
17.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
243 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
