Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+5189%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Apr 2010
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
3 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
